"losers" important to society!

I agree 100% with this column that I had just read. Granted that the "losers" in our society to the jobs that the winners will not do. In this column the person asked some great questions for example...."What would happen to banks if they couldn't charge $35 for a 35-cent overdraft or credit card companies if they couldn't charge ridiculous interest and late fees"? If billions of people in the world quite would anyone notice that they had stop? Most of the counties in the United States depend on criminals paying there fines, to meet their budgets. So basically this column is saying that people that don’t get paid over 10 an hour aren’t losers it just means that they’re not economically in the lead for themselves but they survive and what little money that they get taxes get and that goes to social security.
Or when someone wins the lottery how long does that last? Will it keep that person satisfied? How long will it take till people start to try to loan a little off of that person? Tell you this much it wouldn’t take long to go through the money that you win from the lottery, it wouldn’t take long for that money to be gone so that person wouldn’t have a chance to be satisfied, and it sure and the heck wouldn’t take long for someone to come up to you and ask for money especially if it’s your family. So this column also brought that up to if someone won the lottery would it keep that person satisfied? Answer to that is no not really. Sorry not sorry.
So we the people try to tell the people that are considered that their losers to save money, try to better yourselves. But honestly to me if someone’s happy with being who they are and happy with where they are in live then so be it “don’t go and try to change someone else’s stars”. Some people in this society like the way they are no matter what you try to tell them what to do or say they’ll be themselves no matter what, and that’s fine by me I don’t really care. All people strive to be is happy, so if where they are in life let them be them and worry about yourself.
Another great question asked on this column was “Can there be winners in the stock market without losers”? I’d say no because the winners in society depend on the losers to help them out (metaphorically speaking) with their financial problems. So yeah I’m remain basis whether I completely think that winners can survive without the likes of the losers. Because of the substantial bystanders that the losers help with the fines, the taxes you know all the good stuff that makes the world go round so to speak. There still losers and winners in the same market everyday of each of the winners and the losers of society that cross paths. So yes this paper has brought up some of the pretty interesting questions and made me think of things “sociologically” on how these two sides would effect if they collided with each other? But it’s not my place to ask and answer its for your personal opinion to run wild.